Good Earth :: essays research papers

In the book The Good earthly concern by Pearl S. Buck, the fall of the business firm of Hwang and the rise of theWang family was shown. The story completed a hardening of smell, with Wang being the center of thecircle. While Wang at first-year was intimidated, he also looked down on the suffer of Hwang, he soonfound that when his family became rich, his stand fell onto some of the same curses. In both kinspersons, a lack of love for the land was super noticeable (except for Wang Lung), opium was used,slaves were bought and sold even though Wang first opposed slaves, and the future heirs wished tosell the land for money and at the same time ache their support for if the house should fall.When the House of Hwang was in power, Wang detect how they had a complete lack of lovefor the earth. They had to constantly sell pieces of land to pay their immediate debts, but by doingthis they gave away their support if a no-account time should fall upon the house. Wang knew that thisw ould be the downfall of the house, so he bought the land from the house. After the House ofHwang fell, the House of Wang came to power. Wang kept in mind his whole life that with aside thegood earth, he was nothing. Wang worried when he noticed that his sons lacked his love for theland. Wang was disturbed to think that when he passed away his sons would sell the land, and hisfamily would succumb to the same fate of the Hwang house as shown on page 37 when Wang give tongue to,Sell their land...Then indeed are they growing poor. province is ones flesh and blood.Opium customs duty was a major role in the downfall of the Hwang house. The Old Mistress washeavily addicted to the drug, and in her desire for the drug, she drove her house into the ground. On page 39, Wang was paying the Gate Keeper for the land he was purchasing and the Gate Keepersaid Here is enough for a few old age of opium for the old lady, at any rate. For the House of Wang,opium became almost a relief for Wang when he devised his excogitate to rid his family of his Uncle and hiswife. He could not cast out his Uncle because he was providing protection from marauders. Keepingthis in mind, Wang then gave his Uncle and the Uncles wife some opium hoping that they wouldGood Earth essays research papers In the book The Good Earth by Pearl S. Buck, the fall of the House of Hwang and the rise of theWang family was shown. The story completed a circle of life, with Wang being the center of thecircle. While Wang at first was intimidated, he also looked down on the House of Hwang, he soonfound that when his family became rich, his house fell onto some of the same curses. In bothhouses, a lack of love for the land was highly noticeable (except for Wang Lung), opium was used,slaves were bought and sold even though Wang first opposed slaves, and the future heirs wished tosell the land for money but at the same time lose their support for if the house should fall.When the House of Hwang was in power, Wang noticed how they had a complete lack of lovefor the earth. They had to constantly sell pieces of land to pay their immediate debts, but by doingthis they gave away their support if a dark time should fall upon the house. Wang knew that thiswould be the downfall of the house, so he bought the land from the house. After the House ofHwang fell, the House of Wang came to power. Wang kept in mind his whole life that without thegood earth, he was nothing. Wang worried when he noticed that his sons lacked his love for theland. Wang was disturbed to think that when he passed away his sons would sell the land, and hisfamily would succumb to the same fate of the Hwang house as shown on page 37 when Wang said,Sell their land...Then indeed are they growing poor. Land is ones flesh and blood.Opium usage was a major role in the downfall of the Hwang house. The Old Mistress washeavily addicted to the drug, and in her desire for the drug, she drove her house into the ground. On page 39, Wang was pa ying the Gate Keeper for the land he was purchasing and the Gate Keepersaid Here is enough for a few days of opium for the old lady, at any rate. For the House of Wang,opium became almost a relief for Wang when he devised his plan to rid his family of his Uncle and hiswife. He could not cast out his Uncle because he was providing protection from marauders. Keepingthis in mind, Wang then gave his Uncle and the Uncles wife some opium hoping that they would

Breaking Society’s Rules :: Essays Papers

Breaking Societys Rules American literature often examines population and motives. In Nathaniel Hawthornes novel, The Scarlet Letter, and in Arthur Millers dramatic classic, The Crucible, people and motives often depict patterns of Puritans struggling for life during a precarious time. offense and shame can tear a persons soul away. The inevitable consequence of sin is the immediate reaction of guilt, shame, and remorse. For example prat Proctor, Elizabeth Proctor, and Reverend Dimmesdale have totally committed a sin or sins and are feeling extremely guilty about it. They want to be forgiven, but they have no specialness and are cowards. Forgiveness can only be obtained when these characters find the strength within themselves to speak the truth. The first to commit a sin is John Proctor, the preserve of Elizabeth Proctor. John is a good man until Abigail Williams comes into his life. John lives in a house feeling empty and thinki ng his wife does not love him. lecherousness is a very powerful feeling, and it tempts John right into bed with Abigail. Unfortunately once he commits adultery, Elizabeth does not forgive him. She finds ways to punish John and buzz off him feel more remorseful. For example, Reverend Hale asks John to recite the commandments, and he forgets one, Elizabeth then says sarcastically, Adultery, John. Elizabeth responds in such a manner that John feels overwhelming incommode in his heart. Naturally, Elizabeth feels guilty as well. She tells John, I have sins of my own to count. It needs a cold wife to prompt lechery. Elizabeth feels as though she is to blame for John committing adultery. She is a mother and, of course, Elizabeth will be consumed with taking care of their children, cooking, cleaning, etc. At first, Elizabeth does not recognize John pulling away from her and turning towards Abigail. shortly after Elizabeth finds out John committed adultery with Abby, sh e fires her. Later on in the novel Elizabeth is accused of being a witch and John goes to accost to prove Abigail is lying.

Chasing Amy: A Disregard for Societal Norm Essays -- Chasing Amy Essa

You know, I didnt serious heed what I was taught, men and women should be together, its the natural way, that kind of thing. Im not with you because of what family, society, life tried to educate in me from day one. The way the world is, how seldom it is that you meet that one person who just gets you - its so rare. My parents didnt really devour it. There were no examples stupefy for me in the world of male person-female relationships. And to cut oneself off from finding that person, to immediately halve your options by eliminating the possibility of finding that one person within your own gender, that just seemed paradoxical to me. Alyssa Jones, the heroine of Chasing Amy, calmly explains this in order to reaffirm her love for her boyfriend, Holden. In this quote, Alyssa exudes that she has always felt that individuals mustnt falter to societal heteronormativity. In society, there is an received measure, and that standard is heterosexuality anything that falls outside of that social norm is seen as wrong. Alyssa was adamant about not allowing herself to fall under the ideal that a male collaborationist was the only acceptable end goal in life. The particular agenda that Alyssa set for herself, along with other characters dealing with promiscuity, homosexuality, and homophobia are the reason that I have chosen to analyze Kevin Smiths film, Chasing Amy. In this essay, I aim to establish that Chasing Amy serves as a positive stride for gays and lesbians within a heteronormative culture.Chasing Amy centers virtually two freelance comic book writers/best friends, Holden and Banky. A homosexual acquaintance, Hooper, introduces Holden to a fellow comic book writer, Alyssa. Holden immediately falls for Alyssa and strikes up a close relationship with ... ...iewers from making the same sort of mistakes. Chasing Amy serves as a milestone for all those who choose to work against what they are taught as organism socially acceptable and opens the door to social ch ange. WORKS CITED Pharr, Suzanne. Homophobia and Sexism. The Differences Among Us Division and Connections (1988) 416. Ochs, Robyn. hermaphrodism, Feminism, Men and Me. Sexuality and Relationships (1992) 165. Zimmerman, Bonnie. What Has Never Been An Overview of Lesbian womens rightist. Making a Difference Feminist literary Criticism 179. Kehoe, Monica. Historical, Literary, and Erotic Aspects of Lesbianism. Journals of Homosexuality 1. Rust, Paula C. Rodriguez, Paula C. Rust, and Bisexuality in the United States A Social Science Reader. Criticisms of the Scholarly Literature on Sexuality for its Neglects of Bisexuality 1. Chasing Amy A Disregard for Societal Norm Essays -- Chasing Amy EssaYou know, I didnt just heed what I was taught, men and women should be together, its the natural way, that kind of thing. Im not with you because of what family, society, life tried to instill in me from day one. The way the world is, how seldom it is that you meet that one perso n who just gets you - its so rare. My parents didnt really have it. There were no examples set for me in the world of male-female relationships. And to cut oneself off from finding that person, to immediately halve your options by eliminating the possibility of finding that one person within your own gender, that just seemed stupid to me. Alyssa Jones, the heroine of Chasing Amy, calmly explains this in order to reaffirm her love for her boyfriend, Holden. In this quote, Alyssa exudes that she has always felt that individuals mustnt falter to societal heteronormativity. In society, there is an accepted standard, and that standard is heterosexuality anything that falls outside of that social norm is seen as wrong. Alyssa was adamant about not allowing herself to fall under the ideal that a male partner was the only acceptable end goal in life. The particular agenda that Alyssa set for herself, along with other characters dealing with promiscuity, homosexuality, and homophobia are the reason that I have chosen to analyze Kevin Smiths film, Chasing Amy. In this essay, I aim to establish that Chasing Amy serves as a positive stride for gays and lesbians within a heteronormative culture.Chasing Amy centers around two freelance comic book writers/best friends, Holden and Banky. A homosexual acquaintance, Hooper, introduces Holden to a fellow comic book writer, Alyssa. Holden immediately falls for Alyssa and strikes up a close relationship with ... ...iewers from making the same sort of mistakes. Chasing Amy serves as a milestone for all those who choose to work against what they are taught as being socially acceptable and opens the door to social change. WORKS CITED Pharr, Suzanne. Homophobia and Sexism. The Differences Among Us Division and Connections (1988) 416. Ochs, Robyn. Bisexuality, Feminism, Men and Me. Sexuality and Relationships (1992) 165. Zimmerman, Bonnie. What Has Never Been An Overview of Lesbian Feminist. Making a Difference Feminist Literary Criti cism 179. Kehoe, Monica. Historical, Literary, and Erotic Aspects of Lesbianism. Journals of Homosexuality 1. Rust, Paula C. Rodriguez, Paula C. Rust, and Bisexuality in the United States A Social Science Reader. Criticisms of the Scholarly Literature on Sexuality for its Neglects of Bisexuality 1.

The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn :: Essays Papers

The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn The novel begins with Huck himself writing the story. He briefly describes what has happened to him since The Adventures of tom Sawyer. Huck was adopted by the Widow Douglas and Miss Watson, both of whom took pains to raise him properly. Dissatisfied with his new life, Huck runs away. Tom Sawyer small-armages to bring down Huck back by promising to start a band of robbers. However, many of them soon become bored with the make-believe battles and so the band go apart. Pa returns to find Huck and his money. Judge Thatcher and the Widow try to gain court custody of Huck, but a new judge in township refuses to separate Huck from Pa. Huck soon decides to escape after Pa starts to frequently beat him. After running away Huck runs into his old wizard Jim, who was Miss Waltons slave, before he decided to run away. Jim is frightened at first, believing Huck to be dead, but soon is happy to have a companion. The river starts rising, and at one point an entire house floats past the island. Huck and Jim climb aboard to see what they can salvage. They find a dead man lying in the corner of the house, and Jim goes over to look. Jim realizes that the dead man is Pa, and he carefully refuses to tell Huck who it is. Using a large raft, they float downstream during the nights and hide during the days. Jim and Huck continue floating downstream, becoming close friends in the process. Huck rescues two con-men named Huck and the King. Farther down the river the King and Duke grass Jim into slavery. Huck decides to rescue Jim, and daringly walks up to the house where Jim is being kept. Luckily, the house is owned by none other than Tom Sawyers Aunt Sally. Huck straight pretends to be Tom. When Tom arrives, he pretends to be his younger brother Sid Sawyer. To communicateher he and Huck contrive how to help Jim escape from his prison, an outdoor shed. That night they get Jim and start to run away. The local farmers follow them. Huck, Jim, and Tom manage to escape, but Tom gets shot in the leg by a farmer.

Does Technology Drive History? Essay -- History Technology Essays

A theme that appears over and over in discussions about technology is whether or not technology is the cause of major social, cultural, political, and economic changes in modern society. Of course, we can find many, many examples of technologies associated with enormous social changes. The automobile, for example, is often stave of as causing a whole array of social changes, from the creation of suburbia, to the development of the fast food industry, to the paving of farm land, to the imported oil vulnerabilities of the 1970s. The favorite media is filled with similar examples of hot technologies that are going to change everything, from computers to nanotechnologies to new medical devices. And we are often told that we must find ways to accommodate ourselves to these new devices and to the changes they will cause, that we must strive to ride the wave of social flux produced by emerging technologies, or face the dire prospect of being left(a) fag.This language and these argume nts, whether in the general media or in scholarly analyses, are examples of various kinds of technological determinism, the notion that technology is the most powerful force behind the modern world, that technology drives history (Smith, Marx, 1994). Those who support this idea often claim more technology may well be pushing us in directions we do not want to go, that technology has somehow gotten out of control. Technological determinism comes in different forms. For some, such as the late French scholar Jacques Ellul (1965, 1980, 1990), technology is the most powerful force in modern life, moving according to its own logic, and well beyond the control of humans. Others, such as political theorist Langdon Winner (1977, 1986), assert that tech... ...equired to maintain and operate technological systems, such as electrical power grids, nationwide telephone systems, television networks, etc. While the people involved in technological systems do have the power to make choices -- as the anti-determinists claim -- they must make those choices in settings that can impose momentous limits on the range of choices available, as the determinists claim. In other words, the control of technology becomes more difficult, and maybe ultimately impossible, as we move from smaller and simpler structures and artifacts toward much larger, complex, and mutually beneficial systems. It is much more difficult to change our minds about technologies by and by they have developed such organizational shells as multinational corporations or public utilities, and after so much investment has occurred (Collingridge, 1980, Morone, Woodhouse, 1986).

Dworkins Wishful-Thinkers Constitution Essay -- Argumentative Persuas

Dworkins Wishful-Thinkers ConstitutionABSTRACT Developing ideas first put forth in my Abortion Rights as Religious Freedom, I argue against Ronald Dworkins extensive view of entire interpretation while rejecting the originalism of Justices Scalia and Bork. I champion the view that Justice Black presents in his dissent in Griswold v. Connecticut. INTRODUCTIONIn Lifes territory Ronald Dworkin uses a liberal interpretation of the Constitution to defend constitutional rights to abortion and euthanasia. (1) According to Dworkin, the Constitution lays down general, comprehensive moral standards that government must love but ... leaves it to ... judges to decide what these standards mean in concrete circumstances (p. 119). Any right can become constitutionally protected if five irresponsible Court justices declare it so. As with shaft of light Pan, so with rights protected by the Constitution, believing makes it so.In this paper I explain and reject Dworkins arguments for his view of constitutional interpretation. But with Dworkin, I reject the originalism of Justice Scalia and Robert Bork. I champion, instead, the moderate view that Justice Hugo Black presents in his dissent in Griswold v. Connecticut. (2) DWORKINS ARGUMENTSDworkin notes that the Constitutions language, especially in several(prenominal) clauses of the Bill of Rights, is very abstract. The First Amendment says that Congress shall not infringe freedom of speech, shall not restrict freedom of religion, and shall not establish any religion. But it says goose egg to help judges decide whether specific laws against pornography or flag burning offend freedom of speech or whether laws that ... forbid Native Americans to ingest mescal ... invade freedom of re... ...381 U.S. 479 (1965).(3) Lochner v. New York 198 U.S. 45 (1905).(4) Pierce v. Society of Sisters 268 U.S. 510 (1925).(5) Griswold v. Connecticut 381 U.S. 479, Harlans concurring opinion at 500.(6) Casey v. Planned Parenthood 60 LW 4795 (Jun e 30, 1992).(7) Griswold, at 522. (notes omitted)(8) Griswold, at 513.(9) Griswold, footnote 6 at 514.(10) Griswold, at 519.(11) Adamson v. California, 332 U.S. 46, 90-92 (1947)(Black dissenting). The inserted quote is from Federal Power Commission v Pipeline Co., 315 U. S. 575, 599, 601, n. 4. The entire passage is quoted in Griswold, at 525.(12) Peter S. Wenz, Abortion Rights as Religious Freedom (Philadelphia Temple University Press, 1992).(13) See Wenz, pp. 163-167.(14) Calder v. Bull, 3 Dal. 386, 399 quoted in Griswold, at 525.(15) Griswold, at 519.(16) Griswold, at 501.

Dworkins Wishful-Thinkers Constitution Essay -- Argumentative Persuas

Dworkins Wishful-Thinkers ConstitutionABSTRACT Developing ideas first put forth in my Abortion Rights as Religious Freedom, I argue against Ronald Dworkins liberal view of constitutional interpretation while lowering the originalism of Justices Scalia and Bork. I champion the view that Justice Black presents in his dissent in Griswold v. Connecticut. fundamentIn Lifes Dominion Ronald Dworkin uses a liberal interpretation of the Constitution to defend constitutional rights to abortion and euthanasia. (1) According to Dworkin, the Constitution lays down general, comprehensive moral standards that government must respect but ... leaves it to ... judges to decide what these standards mean in concrete circumstances (p. 119). Any right can become constitutionally defend if five Supreme Court justices declare it so. As with Peter Pan, so with rights protected by the Constitution, believing makes it so.In this paper I explain and reject Dworkins arguments for his view of constitutional i nterpretation. But with Dworkin, I reject the originalism of Justice Scalia and Robert Bork. I champion, instead, the moderate view that Justice Hugo Black presents in his dissent in Griswold v. Connecticut. (2) DWORKINS ARGUMENTSDworkin notes that the Constitutions language, in particular in several clauses of the Bill of Rights, is very abstract. The First Amendment says that Congress shall not infringe freedom of speech, shall not restrict freedom of religion, and shall not establish either religion. But it says nothing to help judges decide whether specific laws against pornography or flag burning offend freedom of speech or whether laws that ... forbid indwelling Americans to ingest peyote ... invade freedom of re... ...381 U.S. 479 (1965).(3) Lochner v. New York 198 U.S. 45 (1905).(4) Pierce v. Society of Sisters 268 U.S. 510 (1925).(5) Griswold v. Connecticut 381 U.S. 479, Harlans concurring opinion at 500.(6) Casey v. Planned Parenthood 60 LW 4795 (June 30, 1992).(7) Gri swold, at 522. (notes omitted)(8) Griswold, at 513.(9) Griswold, footnote 6 at 514.(10) Griswold, at 519.(11) Adamson v. California, 332 U.S. 46, 90-92 (1947)(Black dissenting). The inserted quote is from Federal Power Commission v Pipeline Co., 315 U. S. 575, 599, 601, n. 4. The entire passage is quoted in Griswold, at 525.(12) Peter S. Wenz, Abortion Rights as Religious Freedom (Philadelphia Temple University Press, 1992).(13) See Wenz, pp. 163-167.(14) Calder v. Bull, 3 Dal. 386, 399 quoted in Griswold, at 525.(15) Griswold, at 519.(16) Griswold, at 501.